Nick Garner's Blog

SEO | Online PR | Marketing | Social Media

Blast from the past – The 100 Oldest Currently Registered .COM Domains

March 25th, 2011 · 1 Comment

It’s not very SEO related, but Ive often wondered what the 1st registered .com domains were and what you could sell the biggest ones for.

Ahhhh - the money ££££

The List:

Whats interesting is how early on, no one knew how big this interweb thing would  be. Year 1, there were only about 12 domains registered (that are still live) and year 2 it climbed to about 55 domains.

The graph gives you an idea of the growth rate

Growth in registration of domains by date registered

Google Docs Spreadsheet with URLS etc here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date registered | Domain Name | No of days after 1st domain was registered

3/15/1985    SYMBOLICS.COM    0
4/24/1985    BBN.COM    40
5/24/1985    THINK.COM    70
7/11/1985    MCC.COM    118
9/30/1985    DEC.COM    199
11/7/1985    NORTHROP.COM    237
1/9/1986    XEROX.COM    300
1/17/1986    SRI.COM    308
3/3/1986    HP.COM    353
3/5/1986    BELLCORE.COM    355
3/19/1986    IBM.COM    369
3/19/1986    SUN.COM    369
3/25/1986    INTEL.COM    375
3/25/1986    TI.COM    375
4/25/1986    ATT.COM    406
5/8/1986    GMR.COM    419
5/8/1986    TEK.COM    419
7/10/1986    FMC.COM    482
7/10/1986    UB.COM    482
8/5/1986    BELL-ATL.COM    508
8/5/1986    GE.COM    508
8/5/1986    GREBYN.COM    508
8/5/1986    ISC.COM    508
8/5/1986    NSC.COM    508
8/5/1986    STARGATE.COM    508
9/2/1986    BOEING.COM    536
9/18/1986    ITCORP.COM    552
9/29/1986    SIEMENS.COM    563
10/18/1986    PYRAMID.COM    582
10/27/1986    ALPHACDC.COM    591
10/27/1986    BDM.COM    591
10/27/1986    FLUKE.COM    591
10/27/1986    INMET.COM    591
10/27/1986    KESMAI.COM    591
10/27/1986    MENTOR.COM    591
10/27/1986    NEC.COM    591
10/27/1986    RAY.COM    591
10/27/1986    ROSEMOUNT.COM    591
10/27/1986    VORTEX.COM    591
11/5/1986    ALCOA.COM    600
11/5/1986    GTE.COM    600
11/17/1986    ADOBE.COM    612
11/17/1986    AMD.COM    612
11/17/1986    DAS.COM    612
11/17/1986    DATA-IO.COM    612
11/17/1986    OCTOPUS.COM    612
11/17/1986    PORTAL.COM    612
11/17/1986    TELTONE.COM    612
12/11/1986    3COM.COM    636
12/11/1986    AMDAHL.COM    636
12/11/1986    CCUR.COM    636
12/11/1986    CI.COM    636
12/11/1986    CONVERGENT.COM    636
12/11/1986    DG.COM    636
12/11/1986    PEREGRINE.COM    636
12/11/1986    QUAD.COM    636
12/11/1986    SQ.COM    636
12/11/1986    TANDY.COM    636
12/11/1986    TTI.COM    636
12/11/1986    UNISYS.COM    636
1/19/1987    CGI.COM    675
1/19/1987    CTS.COM    675
1/19/1987    SPDCC.COM    675
2/19/1987    APPLE.COM    706
3/4/1987    NMA.COM    719
3/4/1987    PRIME.COM    719
4/4/1987    PHILIPS.COM    750
4/23/1987    DATACUBE.COM    769
4/23/1987    KAI.COM    769
4/23/1987    TIC.COM    769
4/23/1987    VINE.COM    769
4/30/1987    NCR.COM    776
5/14/1987    CISCO.COM    790
5/14/1987    RDL.COM    790
5/20/1987    SLB.COM    796
5/27/1987    PARCPLACE.COM    803
5/27/1987    UTC.COM    803
6/26/1987    IDE.COM    833
7/9/1987    TRW.COM    846
7/13/1987    UNIPRESS.COM    850
7/27/1987    DUPONT.COM    864
7/27/1987    LOCKHEED.COM    864
7/28/1987    ROSETTA.COM    865
8/18/1987    TOAD.COM    886
8/31/1987    QUICK.COM    899
9/3/1987    ALLIED.COM    902
9/3/1987    DSC.COM    902
9/3/1987    SCO.COM    902
9/22/1987    GENE.COM    921
9/22/1987    KCCS.COM    921
9/22/1987    SPECTRA.COM    921
9/22/1987    WLK.COM    921
9/30/1987    MENTAT.COM    929
10/14/1987    WYSE.COM    943
11/2/1987    CFG.COM    962
11/9/1987    MARBLE.COM    969
11/16/1987    CAYMAN.COM    976
11/16/1987    ENTITY.COM    976
11/24/1987    KSR.COM    984
11/30/1987    NYNEXST.COM    990

If you had gone back in time to 1984, you could have bought and then resold:

1. Insure.com, sold to QuinStreet for $16 million in 2009.
2. Sex.com, sold for $12-$14 million in 2006.
3. Fund.com, sold for $9.99 million in 2008.
4. Porn.com, sold for $9.5 million in 2007.
5. Business.com, sold for $7.5 million in 1999.
6. Diamond.com, sold to Ice.com for $7.5 million in 2006.
7. Beer.com, sold for $7 million in 2004.
8. Israel.com, sold for $5.88 million in 2004.
9. Casino.com, sold for $5.5 million in 2003.
10. Toys.com, sold to Toys ‘R Us for $5.1 million in 2009.

 

→ 1 CommentTags: Random

Marketing Week Presentation

March 22nd, 2011 · No Comments

I had done a presentation for Marketing Week a couple of months ago where I talked about SEO (of course!) the presentation went down pretty well, so out of the blue they called me and asked if I be a stand in for a speaker who couldn’t make the engagement.

It was for a financial services conference. Since this is a very broad area, I decided to go for a generic presentation covering some big ideas I always use when I explain SEO, PPC and conversion optimisation.

I find numbers bore people, so there are only a few of them, instead its lots of pictures and concepts that hopefully the audience could take away with them and use as their foundation for understanding the high level forces that shape SEO , PPC and Conversion.

→ No CommentsTags: Random

The History of Google Dances

March 19th, 2011 · No Comments

Google Dance

If you don’t know – a Google Dance is where Google change their ranking algo (the software that controls what websites rank where) because for whatever reason Google feel the need to fix one issue or another. The msot recent fix has been to combat a plague of article sites ranking across the Internet that allegedly provide useful content, but in fact are no more than ‘thin content’ with large amounts of advertising.

 

Ironically much of this ‘content pollution’ has been perpetuated by Google themselves. They have a programme called AdSense. You may have seen the AdSense adverts in body copy in various websites. These AdSense ads contextualise to the content they are embedded in. Users are reasonably ok with the ads since often they are – sort of – relevant. So the ads get clicked, giving the site owner revenue.

The content has the appearance of usefulness and with  link building, you can get them to rank nicely. Good rankings on decent traffic terms gives enough visitors to probably generate reasonable revenue through AdSense.

But its all got a little out of hand and there has been a clear out of the rankings recently. This update has been called the Farmer/Panda Update.

Below is a history of the major updates so far that have rocked the SEO world.

(Click on the image for a full size readable view.)

The Dance of Dances

 

Thanks to http://level343.com/ for the seo inforgraphic

→ No CommentsTags: SEO Comment

What affiliates want in an operator!

March 10th, 2011 · No Comments

Great if you know how to grow it!

Recently I was discussing the relationship between affiliates and operators. The question was: what does each party care about.

I then sent them a long-ish email and I thought I’d post and amended version for you.

One important thing to consider when you read this : Affiliates exist because of the deficiencies in the operators marketing ‘machine’
Smart operators are always interested in learning from successful affiliates.

What affiliates care about when they are looking at choosing an operator?

Affiliate point of view:
  • Often the only way they can get traffic is by SE(and some other routes), they want operators who are weak with SEO
  • Better deals i.e. ultimately affiliates care about lifetime value since that translates into income spreading along the marketing ‘foodchain’
    • Rev share
    • Bonuses
  • Strong conversions
    • Operator branding is strong
    • Landing pages and messaging is strong
    • Good payment systems in place users can fund easily
  • Better customer retention on the part of the operator, life time values can increase and the increased ££ share can be passed on the affiliates
  • Exclusivity with an affiliate i.e.
    • a unique deal for a given affiliate
    • better than usual bonus for the user for the affiliate sites
  • Back end affiliate management system
    • Needs to be easy to use
    • Reliable
    • Comprehensive information dashboard that allows affiliates to
      • Understand betting patterns of the users
      • Churn rate of the users
      • Lifetime value
      • In fact any metric is good since the affiliate will dig out the information they need.

What operators care about when picking the right affiliates:

  • They want the right customers in volume!
    • Better converting customers
    • Good lifetime values
    • Less cost of acquisition
    • ‘Low maintenance’ users i.e. not using customer services often
  • What they want in affiliates
    • Low maintenance i.e. affiliate managers don’t need twork with affiliates often
    • Low cost i.e.  the lower the affiliate spend the better, assuming higher numbers of good new users.
  • Affiliate management systems to be flexible, cheap and easy to run
  • Fewer affiliate managers
  • Affiliates to be really flexible when it comes taking new marketing assets i.e. new banners.
  • They want traffic from SEO, the better they are at SEO the less reliant they are on affiliates

Assuming the previous points, the next question is what operators would ask about affiliate marketing practices.

  • Why are affiliates outranking the operators
    • What SEO are they using
    • How they can do it for a fraction of the cost of an operator (assuming affiliate budgets are tiny)
    • What technology affiliates use that operators could take on board.
  • On PPC
    • Why are affiliates out converting operators?
    • How do they do ‘blackhat PPC’
    • How can operators fight this (if they are loosing share against affiliates)
  • What would persuade affiliates join an operator programme?
  • How to find good affiliates and get your offer right 1st time. (varies from operator toperator – a lot! )
    • What is their online profile i.e. what does a great affiliate site look like?
    • What metrics should you use tidentify them?
    • What tools do you need find them
  • Variations on what an operator wants from an affiliate
  • Operator strategies and finding the right affiliates for their requirements.
    • Needs large volumes of users to increase liquidity
    • Needs large volumes of low acquisition cost users to up sell later with CRM
    • Small volumes of high value users
  • How do you recruit affiliates in scale
  • How do you manage the ‘long tail’

There are a lot of questions here, but as you know – good answers come from good questions!

→ No CommentsTags: Random

Marketing Week Conference – SEO and Social

February 5th, 2011 · No Comments

Happily, I was recently asked to do a session on “search in a social world” for a Marketing Week conference here in London

Me in a suit

The programme was:
- Strategy for social, covering all the three states of user of commercial intent – background knowledge, specific questions, decision to buy

- Prerequisites to get on the starting line – corporate culture, brand love, popularity of the subject, site architecture

- Targeting resource for maximum ROI

- KPI’s that actually mean something

- Putting it together as a actionable plan

Instead of getting bogged down in the area of social signals in SEO, I decided to take a different approach to the question of search in a social world and essentially I put out the idea
“social = validation, search = navigation”

I then dug into the idea that users (often) use social exchange points like forums to get information and resolution about things they want to buy. Of course to find these hot spots, they have to use search engines.

So its great to work your Facebook, but so often the real value is helping those important conversations where people evaluate your product and cast a vote. If they are good, then promote them! Social proof/validation is about the most powerful endorsement you can have online.

Here is the powerpoint:

→ No CommentsTags: Random

Genius hacker gets his mac back

January 13th, 2011 · No Comments

This is one of the coolest geek things ive seen in ages.

Cool geek gets laptop stolen.
Eventually remotely tracks down machine .
Hacks in.
LoL’s follow!

→ No CommentsTags: Random